Site logo

The FBA Surcharge Is the Easy Part

Five weeks into the war in Iran, Amazon told its third-party sellers on Thursday that a 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge would be added to their fulfillment fees starting April 17. The surcharge applies to sellers in the U.S. and Canada, calculated against fulfillment fees rather than sale price, and equates on average to an additional $0.17 per unit for FBA shipments, varying by item size and dimensions, the company said. On May 2, according to Supply Chain Dive, the charge extends to Buy with Prime in the U.S. and Multi-Channel Fulfillment in the U.S. and Canada. Amazon provided no end date.

Amazon spokesperson Ashley Vanicek said the surcharge is “meaningfully lower” than levies applied by other major carriers, and that the company had absorbed elevated costs before passing them on. That comparison has merit. UPS and FedEx surcharges now run roughly 20% to 25% of shipping costs, according to Axios. Against that backdrop, 3.5% is a narrow addition. The more useful frame for sellers is not how the surcharge compares to UPS rates but what it adds to a fee structure that was already moving before the Iran conflict began.

In 2022, Amazon implemented a 5% fuel and inflation surcharge on FBA fees, framed it as temporary, then folded it into broader fee restructuring rather than reversing it. The current charge is lower at 3.5%, but carries the same structural feature: no stated conditions for removal. Noah Wickham, VP of sales and marketing at Amazon seller agency My Amazon Guy, wrote in a LinkedIn post that he expects Amazon will “keep it regardless” even if fuel prices fall. His firm works with Amazon sellers, so this is practitioner observation rather than independent analysis, but the 2022 precedent supports the read.

UPS, FedEx, and USPS Are All Moving at Once

Amazon is not acting in isolation. Oil prices jumped more than 40% following the start of the Iran conflict, and the U.S. Postal Service is seeking an 8% fuel surcharge on packages effective April 26, which would be the first in its history, according to CNBC. UPS introduced a $0.64 per-pound surge fee for volume between the U.S. and 15 countries in the Middle East, and FedEx applied a $0.50 per-pound demand surcharge on shipments from the U.S. to dozens of countries across the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa, Supply Chain Dive reported. UPS imposed its third domestic fuel surcharge increase of the year on March 9, according to FreightWaves.

For sellers managing multi-carrier fulfillment programs, the Amazon announcement is the most recent addition to a cost environment that has been moving since late February, not the opening move.

What Was Already on the Stack

The April 17 charge arrives on top of base rate changes that took effect in January. Amazon increased FBA fulfillment fees by an average of $0.08 per unit starting January 15, following a full freeze on increases in 2025, Supply Chain Dive reported. Buy with Prime fulfillment fees rose by $0.24 per unit on average, and Multi-Channel Fulfillment fees climbed an average of $0.30 per unit. Amazon described those as modest and pointed sellers toward packaging optimization and inventory management as offsets.

The fuel surcharge does not replace any of that. For sellers on standard-size items, the structure now includes base FBA fees, inbound placement fees, aged inventory surcharges for units stored beyond 181 days, low-inventory-level fees, and a fuel surcharge with no sunset date. Each line was characterized as manageable when introduced. The cumulative picture is what sellers modeling 2026 unit economics in late 2025 did not have.

Where the Exposure Differs

The surcharge does not hit every seller the same way, and the MCF dimension is where the math gets most consequential.

High-velocity, compact SKUs priced above $20 will likely absorb the $0.17 average per-unit FBA increase without fundamental margin disruption. Sellers in lower-ASP categories or carrying heavier items are running a harder calculation. The sharpest exposure sits with brands using Multi-Channel Fulfillment to serve Shopify storefronts, Walmart, or other off-Amazon channels from a shared inventory pool.

MCF fees rose $0.30 per unit on average in January against FBA’s $0.08 increase, already widening the cost gap between fulfilling Amazon marketplace orders and fulfilling off-Amazon orders from the same fulfillment centers. The May 2 extension of the fuel surcharge to MCF widens it further. Brands that chose MCF because it lets them serve multiple channels without splitting inventory are looking at a cost structure that has moved twice in ninety days. At low volumes the incremental exposure is modest. At the scale where MCF decisions get made by VP-level operations and supply chain teams, the compounding effect across a full SKU catalog is the number worth running before May 2, not after.

Conversations On Retail

Conversations On Retail is a gathering place and resource center for retail and CPG executives, built to make it easier to stay current, discover the technologies and solutions shaping the industry, and connect with the people driving it forward.

We publish news, views, and reviews from staff editors, contributing experts, and trusted partners. Some articles are developed internally, while others are submitted by industry contributors or adapted from interviews and recorded conversations with industry leaders.

More Posts by This Contributor

Nearly six years ago Walmart sent 500 shelf-scanning robots home after concluding that workers picking online orders could see the
Conversations On Retail
July 20, 2026
n 2012, Dollar Shave Club spent $4,000 on the YouTube video that built the brand. This month, it spent a
Conversations On Retail
July 14, 2026
For two years, the marquee nuclear power deals have all read the same way: a tech giant buys a reactor's
Conversations On Retail
June 25, 2026

Comments

  • No comments yet.
  • Add a comment
    Please, select form to show

    Contact

    Sign Up For Our Newsletter

    Select options...

    Conversations On Retail is an independent platform. References to retailers, brands, technologies, or trademarks throughout our content are for informational and educational purposes only and do not imply any partnership, sponsorship, or commercial endorsement unless explicitly stated.

    The views and opinions expressed on this site are those of the individual authors and contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any company or organization discussed. All content is based on publicly available information, including but not limited to news reports, press releases, SEC filings, and publicly shared industry data. Nothing on this site should be construed as professional, legal, or financial advice.

    We are committed to accuracy and fairness. If you believe any content on this site contains an error or requires clarification, we welcome your feedback and will promptly review and address any concerns.

    ©2026 Conversations On Retail. All Rights Reserved.