The $5 Million Threshold: Ocado Repositions for U.S. Grocers That Skipped the CFC Era

When Kroger closed its automated customer fulfillment centers in Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin; Frederick, Maryland; and Groveland, Florida in January 2026, it was marking something beyond the end of specific facilities. The closures — accompanied by a $2.6 billion impairment charge and a stated goal of improving e-commerce operating profitability by $400 million in 2026, as Kroger disclosed in November 2025 — signaled that the model Ocado had built its entire North American commercial strategy around was being stress-tested in ways its architects had not anticipated. The three CFCs had opened between June 2021 and June 2023. Kroger and Ocado’s original partnership, announced in May 2018, had targeted 20 such facilities across the United States.

For Ocado, the fallout was immediate and quantifiable. Kroger agreed to a one-time cash payment of $350 million to compensate Ocado for the early closures and for canceling the previously planned Charlotte, North Carolina CFC that had been expected to go live in 2026, according to Ocado’s December 5, 2025 regulatory filing and Chain Store Age. The company simultaneously acknowledged an approximate $50 million reduction in annual fee revenue. Then, in January 2026, Canadian grocer Sobeys announced it would close the Ocado-powered fulfillment center it had developed in Calgary, with a £18 million settlement also received. By late February, Ocado was announcing cuts of about 1,000 roles — roughly 5% of its global workforce, with about two-thirds of those positions in the UK and about half from its R&D team, CEO Tim Steiner told Reuters on February 26, 2026.

Ocado’s full-year results for the period ended November 30, 2025 showed revenue of £1.36 billion, up 12.1%, and technology solutions revenue of £561.2 million, up 13%, with adjusted EBITDA of £178 million compared to £111.7 million a year earlier. The company also recorded an after-tax profit of £388.4 million, against a £352.6 million loss in FY24 — though Ocado’s own FY25 annual report notes that this figure was substantially shaped by approximately £261 million in closure fees from Kroger and £18 million from Sobeys, both received in early 2026 and classified as one-time items. Steiner indicated the company is targeting cash flow positivity in the second half of its 2025/26 fiscal year, with full-year positive cash generation expected in 2026/27. The organizational restructuring and the end of exclusivity represent a genuine strategic reset, and Ocado is now building a U.S. pipeline around a product that did not exist when the Kroger partnership was formed.

A Smaller Footprint, A Different Customer

The pivot Steiner described to Reuters involves a scaled-down system built for deployment inside or directly adjacent to existing grocery stores, rather than the large dedicated buildings at the center of the Kroger partnership. The store-based system covers roughly 4,000 to 5,000 square feet and can hold around 20,000 products. It uses the same grid-based robotics array that Ocado deploys in its full-scale customer fulfillment centers, operating alongside human workers, and it includes pickup ports where drivers collect completed orders. According to Ocado’s product documentation, the design places automated storage and retrieval within a compact footprint integrated into or beside an existing store, supporting same-day pickup and local delivery rather than the next-day radius model the CFCs were built around. The sites can also function as standalone facilities where store integration is not an option.

The critical question for any grocer evaluating the technology is whether their current online order volume justifies the investment. Steiner was direct on this point during Ocado’s recent earnings call, drawing a clear line: the system makes economic sense for stores generating $5 million or more in annual online sales at a single site. He specifically cautioned against building it at $2 to $3 million per site, stating the return is not yet there. The $5 million to $8 million range, growing, was where he placed the threshold for beginning to seriously consider the investment. That framing narrows the addressable market considerably but also allows Ocado to make a credible return-on-investment argument from the start — something the CFC model struggled with as Kroger’s lower-volume facilities failed to reach the order density the economics required. The five CFCs that remain live in Kroger’s network — in Monroe, Ohio; Dallas; Atlanta; Denver; and Detroit — are concentrated in markets where demand density has held up. A sixth, in Phoenix, is still planned to go live in 2026, according to Ocado’s partner page.

The Competitive Field

Scaling down its approach places Ocado in direct competition with other providers of micro-fulfillment and in-store automated fulfillment technologies. The category has had a mixed track record in the United States, with many earlier deployments failing to achieve sustainable unit economics. There are, however, indications that the market is beginning to consolidate around larger players with deeper capital commitments. Walmart acquired automation specialist Alert Innovation in October 2022 to bring the company’s in-store Alphabot fulfillment technology in-house, citing its ability to deploy systems across the roughly 4,700 U.S. stores located within 10 miles of 90% of the population, according to Supply Chain Dive. Interact Analysis projected in March 2025 that Walmart could account for roughly a third of total automated MFC deployments across the Americas between 2025 and 2030, estimating the retailer’s plan at a minimum of 400 systems. Amazon, separately, is currently piloting an in-store micro-fulfillment setup at a Whole Foods location in Pennsylvania, as Grocery Dive reported in November 2025.

That two of the most resource-intensive operators in U.S. grocery are committing to store-level automation at scale creates a meaningful competitive backdrop. A regional chain evaluating the technology is not choosing between Ocado and nothing; it is choosing within a market where Walmart and Amazon are actively setting consumer expectations for same-day fulfillment speed and accuracy — and where grocers that do not build those capabilities risk losing the online customers they have already acquired.

Ocado’s argument to that audience rests on operational depth rather than brand recognition. Its full-year results noted that international CFC volumes grew 26% year-over-year in FY25. The platform processed 72 million orders shipped worldwide during the fiscal year. For a regional grocer without Walmart’s scale or Amazon’s infrastructure budget, a vendor that has spent more than two decades building and operating online grocery fulfillment across multiple retail formats and markets offers a different kind of credibility than a newer entrant to the space. The more pertinent question, for a grocer weighing a system that has not yet been deployed at U.S. sites, is how quickly Ocado can produce domestic operational proof points at the order volumes typical of a regional chain.

The directional shift in U.S. grocery e-commerce that created pressure on Kroger’s CFC model also opens the commercial window Ocado is trying to enter. EMARKETER’s January 2026 research placed Walmart at 30.9% of U.S. grocery e-commerce sales, Amazon at 23.6%, and Kroger at 9.1% — a distribution that reflects how much of the online grocery market has been built on store-based fulfillment infrastructure rather than centralized automation. Bricks Meets Clicks data cited by Interact Analysis put U.S. online grocery sales growth at 17.7% year-over-year in the second half of 2025, a sustained rate that increases the number of regional grocers likely to be crossing the per-site thresholds Steiner identified. Even Kroger, while closing three CFCs, disclosed plans to pilot what it described as capital-light, store-based automation in high-volume markets as part of its restructured fulfillment strategy — a signal that store-integrated automation is increasingly viewed as the practical path to e-commerce profitability rather than a fallback from it.

Steiner told Reuters that Ocado’s goal is to run pilot deployments at several U.S. sites before pursuing broader scale. That measured sequencing reflects both the company’s need to validate performance in the American operating environment and its current financial position as it works toward cash flow breakeven. Ocado’s December 2025 announcement that its exclusivity arrangements had ended in most markets positions the company to pursue multiple international relationships simultaneously, the first time it has had that flexibility in years. For U.S. grocers whose online sales have crossed the $5 million per-site threshold and are growing, the pitch arrives at a moment when the industry has become substantially more receptive to store-integrated automation than it was when the first Kroger CFC went live in Monroe, Ohio in April 2021.

Conversations On Retail

Conversations On Retail is a gathering place and resource center for retail and CPG executives, built to make it easier to stay current, discover the technologies and solutions shaping the industry, and connect with the people driving it forward.

We publish news, views, and reviews from staff editors, contributing experts, and trusted partners. Some articles are developed internally, while others are submitted by industry contributors or adapted from interviews and recorded conversations with industry leaders.