How Target Is Trying to Reclaim Its In-Store Edge

The Challenge: Brand Identity Under Pressure

Target built its brand on the appeal of clean, organized stores that combined affordability with style. For years, the chain’s reputation for an enjoyable shopping environment set it apart from warehouse clubs and discount competitors. Recently, however, that reputation has suffered.

Reports of messy aisles, locked merchandise, and slower checkouts have become more common. Shoppers who once praised Target for its polish now describe a decline in both presentation and service. Industry observers point to these changes, along with staffing cuts and shifting priorities, as warning signs of a company losing the spark that defined its brand.

Customer traffic has reflected the trend. Analysts from Placer.ai and other research firms have documented steady declines in store visits through 2025. The problem, many experts say, stems from an internal tug-of-war between serving in-store guests and supporting online fulfillment.

How Fulfillment Became a Burden

Several years ago, Target made a bold move by transforming nearly all its locations into mini fulfillment centers. Instead of relying solely on large warehouses, it used its store network to pick and pack online orders for home delivery. The model was efficient and capital-light, reducing shipping times and leveraging existing real estate.

But it also created operational friction. Employees who once focused entirely on helping customers and maintaining displays were suddenly responsible for boxing online orders and managing logistics. Store managers had to run both a retail floor and a fulfillment business at once. Over time, that dual mission began to strain the guest experience.

In an interview with CNBC, Chief Supply Chain Officer Gretchen McCarthy acknowledged that the approach had become more complex than expected. She explained that Target is now redesigning its fulfillment footprint to better align each store’s role.

A Shift in Strategy

Target began testing a new model in Chicago earlier this year, designating certain stores to focus exclusively on in-store guests and pickup orders, while others took on a larger share of shipping volume. Out of roughly 100 Chicago-area stores, 18 stopped handling ship-to-home deliveries, and six expanded their shipping operations.

The results were promising. Stores that no longer packed boxes saw improved inventory levels, higher guest satisfaction, and cleaner presentation. Company surveys found a 10-percent increase in customer ratings for those locations. By concentrating fulfillment activity at fewer sites, Target reduced delivery stops, improved efficiency, and extended its same-day delivery cutoff time from noon to 6 p.m.

The plan is now expanding beyond Chicago. By late 2026, the company expects to roll out similar adjustments across more than half its major markets.

Lessons for Retail Leaders

Target’s experience highlights a challenge many retailers face as they blend digital and physical operations. Turning stores into fulfillment hubs can be efficient, but it can also dilute the customer experience if not carefully managed.

Several lessons emerge from Target’s restructuring:

• Not every store is suited for online order fulfillment. Layout, storage capacity, and foot traffic vary widely.
• Simplifying operations can lift performance. When staff focus on either guest service or shipping, productivity and morale improve.
• The store experience remains a vital differentiator. Customers judge retailers not only on prices and speed but also on how pleasant and reliable the shopping trip feels.

These lessons reach beyond Target. Any retailer that has layered e-commerce responsibilities onto its store teams faces similar trade-offs.

The Road Ahead

Target’s leadership is under pressure to reverse four years of flat sales and sliding shopper sentiment. As incoming CEO Michael Fiddelke steps in, he is signaling renewed focus on store health, inventory reliability, and operational discipline.

The strategy has potential, but execution will determine whether it succeeds. Fulfillment realignment may restore focus inside stores, but the retailer still faces challenges with assortment, pricing, and perception. Shoppers frustrated by empty shelves or long lines can defect quickly, and competitors like Walmart and Costco continue to raise the bar for efficiency and value.

For Target, success will depend on whether it can once again make stores feel like a destination. Cleaner aisles, fuller shelves, and friendlier service are not small matters. They are the foundation of the brand’s identity. Restoring that experience, while keeping pace with modern logistics, could decide whether Target’s next chapter is a rebound or a reckoning.

Conversations On Retail

Conversations On Retail is a gathering place and resource center for retail and CPG executives, built to make it easier to stay current, discover the technologies and solutions shaping the industry, and connect with the people driving it forward.

We publish news, views, and reviews from staff editors, contributing experts, and trusted partners. Some articles are developed internally, while others are submitted by industry contributors or adapted from interviews and recorded conversations with industry leaders.